Packet switching works well for moving data — why not use it for moving humans? In a nutshell, the French Aramis transit project proposed packet switching as a. This book was originally published as Aramis, l’amour des Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. Latour, Bruno. [Aramis. I:onglish]. Aramis. Aramis is a very high tech automated subway that was developped in France during the 80s; after its sudden demise, an investigation has been requested in the.
|Published (Last):||5 August 2017|
|PDF File Size:||2.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Articles needing additional references from October All articles needing additional references Pages to import images to Wikidata. In a nutshell, the French Aramis transit project proposed packet switching as a solution to human transport problems though, so far as I can tell, neither the author nor any reviews I have yet read have made this connection.
Defies characterization, in a good way. What I found particularly annoying were the romantic passages from the voice of Aramis and Frankenstein’s monster. The reader is eventually led to see the project from the point of view of Aramis, and along the way gains insight into the relationship between human beings and their technological creations.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Aramis – the Love of Technology
As the young engineer and professor follow Aramis’ trail–conducting interviews, analyzing documents, assessing the evidence–perspectives keep shifting: Ships from and sold by Amazon.
The structure of the book is perhaps experimental and it may not please many people: Jan 17, Elizabeth rated it really liked it Shelves: What is the brilliant solution that Detective Latour offers to justify the whole research?
David Edgerton Times Literary Supplement On the basis of a detailed empirical study, [Latour] has written three books in one: Even though this way of introducing his ideas can be attractive and appealing, it makes more difficult to criticize them, as they are all covered by rhetorical tropes.
In this book, Latour addresses the social and political factors implicated in the development of technological projects. This is because he combines philosophical sophistication with genuine delight in empirical fieldwork, a fluent and flexible style, an amazingly wide range of reference, and wit.
Aramis, or the Love of Technology — Bruno Latour | Harvard University Press
Want to Read Currently Reading Read. The methodological implications of this sociology-fiction method of research are disastrous: See all 6 reviews. Aramis is a strange but deep book that comes to counterintuitive, urgent conclusions, pleading for more successful parlay between wramis and humanism, animate and inanimate, body and soul. Actor—network theory Blackboxing Graphism thesis Mapping controversies Oligopticon Translation sociology.
As if it were not obvious that technology bfuno just a projection of human creativity and social productivity. The result is a hypertext, weaving real and fictional characters together against the backdrop of an actual project carried out by RATP, the public transport authority for Paris Aramis, an innovative public transportation system developed in France between and that, despite its apparent technological interest and all the efforts invested in it, finally failed to see agamis light.
It also provides, mainly in the form of methodological discussions, the groundwork for a theory of technology and society. It is very difficult to gauge whether what has been established is just the basics, or the grunt of the work, leaving only the details.
Because of this varied mixture, and the frequent change of voices, in the end, the latpur becomes a mush itself, with the reader losing sight of what she is reading now, and what purpose it serves in understanding innovative technological research. Margaret Wertheim New Scientist Relationalists have latoue insist that made-found is as dubious as the value-fact and subject-object distinctions.
Bruno Latour’s “Aramis or the love of technology” – Critical commentary
I honestly can’t believe I was never assigned to read this in any of my coursework, as it seems like it would be a natural fit into any methods course and would add so much to traditional methods readings, which are inordinately dry and dull considering, in aramiss case, they are meant to describe ethnography.
It begins with the question “Who killed Aramis the project? Explore the Home Gift Guide.
So, in his view we are created by God in the the same way we lwtour automated machines: It is a necessary pre-knowledge to make sense of what is observed. Inger Mewburn rated it it was amazing Jul 21, With all the brouhaha about moving bytes around on the information superhighways, moving people around real cities has become less glamorous — after all, the current mythology is that telecommuting will render the automobile obsolete, right?
To such and end, he uses the case study of a failed technological project: Who is really interested in Aramis or PRT?
Trivia About Aramis, or the Lo The use of aramiw sociological framework to interpret and make sense of the information obtained is not, necessarily, a bias. Society is the real object of study beneath any social research, and the particular aims of a research only can make sense in relation with that whole picture. It should also be read by anybody looking for some genuinely fresh philosophical ideas. We Have Never Zramis Modern.