The historian’s fallacy is an informal fallacy that occurs when one assumes that decision Fischer did not suggest that historians should refrain from retrospective analysis in their work, but he reminded historians that their subjects were not. Full text of “Historians Fallacies Toward A Logic Of Historical Thought” ; quoted in Roger A. Fischer, “Racial Segregation in Ante Bellum New Orleans,”. HISTORIANS’. FALLACIES. Toward a Logic of Historical Thought by David Hackett Fischer. HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS. NEW YORK, EVANSTON, AND.

Author: Duzragore Dozilkree
Country: Solomon Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Personal Growth
Published (Last): 22 November 2010
Pages: 472
PDF File Size: 20.90 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.73 Mb
ISBN: 990-1-94263-184-7
Downloads: 3477
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akigami

Full text of “Historians Fallacies Toward A Logic Of Historical Thought”

Wedgwood writes, “The older historians con- centrated more on narrative than on analysis, on the How rather than the Why of history. Taylor proceeds to deal with this difficult problem by rejecting both his major premises. The historoans of haulage by canal boats is merely one of many imponder- ables. An incomplete account can be an objectively true account; it cannot be the whole truth.

I never even thought of it like that before. Nov 01, Franz rated it it was amazing. Fogel measures “primary flalacies of the transportation system in terms of the costs of haulage by railroads, as But there also is, in Cotton’s distinction, a repudiation of “hereditary authority and power” in formal institutional arrangements p.

Toward a Logic of Tischer Thought. As we become more experimental in our thoughts and acts, we must find a way to deal with experiments that fail.

Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought – David Hackett Fischer – Google Books

But to insist, as some analytic philosophers of history would, that they are not explanations is, itself, a tautology. It is merely assumed that historians will do so.

But the sparse positive suggestions he produces as postscripts to the catalogues of errors prove to be rather commonplace roles of right reasoning; their afllacies seems justified only by the rather hefty evidence Fischer marshals to demonstrate how blithely they are ignored.


This aspect of the New Eco- nomic History is not new at all, but ancient, and even anachronistic. Fourth, relativists all argued that they and their friends were exempt from relativism in some degree. This method hishorians slow, but it is the only one which is sure. Open Preview See a Problem? Tautologies can be exceedingly useful in the clarification of con- fkscher. Underhill, quoted in Toynbee, Reconsiderations New York,p. It is not to put up signs everywhere — there isn’t enough lumber and paint in the world for that.

In the 50s and 60s of the twentieth century David Hackett Fischer was fiscber renowned American historian who earned his spurs in the historiography of the United States. Danto, Analytical Philosophy of History Cambridge,chap. Sep 23, John Stelwagon rated it it was amazing Shelves: But some questions which historians have asked are merely seman- Here again, Briden- baugh’s books provide a plenitude of examples.

This pure empiricism may be historuans very sound basis for any scientific activity and evolution, but excluding all more theoretical or artistic points of view seems to me — philosophically – rather dubious and not a fruitful way of addressing science.

Marshall, who has written. The incidence of simple factual error in hisrorians history today is nothing short of ap- palling. If a fact is a true statement about past events, then there is no practicable limit to the number of facts which are relevant to even the smallest historical problem.

Fischer manages to be funny while being both thoughtful and thought histkrians. After a survey of these various forms of error, the chapter will end with an attempt to articulate a few affirmative axioms.

But while McDonald’s body was moving on wheels, his mind was moving on hinges. Consider the statement attributed historizns Marshal Turenne, “He who has That statement is true, no matter what the motives of its maker may have been. Each of these impressionistic snippets of pseudo-factual information is consistent with a thesis that 1 the streets fallacirs New Amsterdam hitorians knee-deep in trash; or 2 the streets of New Amsterdam were kept spotlessly clean by the 6.


An historians’ evidence must prove a fact! If he does not, then he will pay a penalty in a diminution of the degree to which his purposes are attained. Elton skirts this position, in an essay on historical method. Edward Kirkland, an economic historian of the old school, complains that there is a kind of doublethink in the work of Fogel and his friends.

Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought

Mullett, in The American Historical Review 72 Feudalism — Cause or Cure of Anarchy? No hypothesis can be conceived as “empirically verifiable” except in the degree to which it is verified.

Printed in the United Sulci of America. A historian is someone anyone who asks an open-ended question about past events and answers it with selected facts which are arranged in the form of an explanatory paradigm. Histroians 25, Joshua Horn rated it it was amazing. The result is a dialogue between essayists and monographers which resembles the ex- change between Hamlet and Polonius: The rest of his figures are for the most part unspecified, and therefore unclear.

Books by David Hackett Fischer. Conscious methodologies are not an indispensable prerequisite to historiana success. But, I did learn something substantial in that first chapter: Provided a historian does not falsify information or arrive at unfounded conclusions, he should be permitted to deviate from the accepted understanding of an event and offer alternative explanations.

Dec 28, Charles M. Fallacies of QuestionFraming 3. There are many objective truths to be told about the past — great and vital truths that are relevant and even urgent to tischer needs of mankind.

The progress of an empirical science of history squarely depends upon a sense of the possible. First, his evidence of a transportation net which might have operated in the absence of railroads is necessarily derived from a world in which railroads were present.